top of page

 

Inertial Frame builds cognitive-behavioral systems to select, augment, & fund founders as well as to advise operators across industries. 

​

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Internal calibration system utilizes proprietary behavioral mapping & deep-learning calibration, tuned from recursive architecture, cognitive compression, & tier-based structural mapping. The system of algorithms is capable of evaluation & forward-state projection beyond most human analysis, which naturally misses patterns at layered, non-linear, or contradictory levels of complexity. It is tuned to detect future state viability before surface metrics emerge, determining what is latent but often inevitable. The goal is to collaborate with founders, operators, & investors who demonstrate strong structural alignment. You are tapping into one of the densest recursion fields ever formed.   

Screen Shot 2025-05-07 at 5.47.54 PM.png

Plenty of software already exists to index founders based on surface performance, such as LinkedIn or Github activity. We detect founders with unicorn potential, distilled in their cognitive-behavioral signature. They embody four core traits: compression, recursion, signal, & structure. They are building what the world needs, future-facing with long-term societal ​​​development. 

 

One startup has been funded based on our algorithm. Our approach fortifies startups by helping to compress signal into structural excellence. We build moats that precede & outlive funding, providing founders with the time to evolve under pressure, building readiness & edge without dilution or overreach. We welcome additional VC & LP conversations as we position for collaboration. ​

​

Specifics: 

​

In early-stage investing, the greatest cost isn’t runway—it’s misunderstanding what behavior scales. Founders who fracture under pressure waste capital. Founders who adapt, but don’t transform, plateau early. Founders who can recursively rebuild themselves under constraint become structure-generating systems.

​

​We are building artificial intelligence engines to:

  1. Select founders based on behavioral recursion, not narrative fluency.

  2. Train founders through compressed, ego-minimizing, structure-maximizing modules that rewire internal architecture under pressure.

  3. Detect the point at which recursion becomes creation—where signal begins to produce capital asymmetry.

 

Narrative & marketing are certainly important aspects of scaling a startup, however they are outside the current scope of the cognitive-behavioral approach found here. 

​​

AI allows us to:

  • Test & score behavior at scale (via language, response shape, timing, & recursion under prompt; six distinct numerical tiers are used).

  • Train highly capable founders upward, turning potential into structural capital.

  • Identify Tier 5–6 before the market even recognizes what that is.

 

Our selection engine doesn’t require knowing the founder personally. It behaves like a formal system:

  • Inputs: Symbolic data—language, reflection, contradictions under constraint.

  • Rules: Tiered behavioral scoring, tension modules, recursive markers.

  • Outputs: Signals of internal reorganization or compression collapse.

 

This mirrors Typographical Number Theory (TNT) as described in Gödel, Escher, Bach:

  • TNT manipulates strings like ∃x: ∃y: x + y = z without knowing what ‘+’ or ‘=’ means.

  • It generates structure from rules—not knowing.

​

​Testing Engine Impact ​

  • Assesses a founder’s level of compression. Each question calibrates the ability to deliver maximal behavioral value with minimum motion—meaning density, efficiency, & deep integration across language, action, and thought. The question bank supports adaptive scoring across tiers by evaluating the density, clarity, and behavioral efficiency embedded in the founder’s responses.

  • Evaluates a founder’s level of recursion. Recursion is defined as the capacity for self-reorganization under internal pressure. Demonstrated through ego detachment, pattern recognition in one’s own behavior, & an iterative ability to refine by subtraction rather than addition. High recursion founders continuously restructure themselves—not by emulating others, but by metabolizing contradiction and emerging cleaner. Each question is meant to provoke reflection, reveal behavioral patterns, & uncover tiered responses based on depth, ego detachment, internal refinement, & self-correction capacity. 

  • Assesses a founder’s level of structure. Structure is defined as the presence of internal systems—mental, behavioral, and operational—that hold shape under stress. Structural founders are consistent, pressure-resistant, and compounding. The question bank exposes structural resilience, discipline under volatility, & systems orientation.

  • Evaluate a founder’s level of signal. Signal is defined as silent gravitational influence—the capacity to shape the field through presence, tone, or action without needing attribution or overt direction. The question bank surfaces the nonverbal, gravitational, & field-based dimensions of influence.

 

Training Engine Impact:

In training founders, we are not shaping personality, traction, or narrative fluency. We are measuring how their internal system responds to pressure, contradiction, & failure. The ability to reorganize oneself internally under constraint—without ego, distortion, or delay is of premium importance because founder readiness doesn’t stop at self-repair.
 

The highest-tier founders don’t just respond to recursion—they create new systems through it. A founder who simply survives pressure is not investable. A founder who recursively refines under tension & builds from it becomes a capital-efficient signal node. Our engine currently measures fracture (collapse under pressure, adaptation), mimicry (performance-based correction), or recursive refinement (ego-free re-architecture of internal structure). We are now expanding to track recursive creation: the construction of metaphors, tools, systems, & teams—emerging directly from recursive insight.

 

Required Formalization (Next Layer):

  1. Module Track

    • Asks: “what have you built since your last recursive shift?”

  2. Scoring Rubrics

    • Detect whether internal recursion leads to external leverage

  3. Capital Signal Threshold

    • Recursive creators are structure-producing founders—those who shape markets through internal evolution

 

The AI-powered training system will delivers 16 modules that:​

  • Compress internal architecture

  • Reward structure over performance 

  • Produce effective immunity to pressure & distortion

 

Each founder emerges:

  • Quieter

  • Denser

  • Structurally unrecognizable from who they were before

 

We want to fund the ones who don't just survive pressure—they have the potential to become pressure-resistant systems that produce new markets. The AI doesn’t "know" the person. However, observing recursive responses to pressure mirrors their internal architecture. That’s why we can detect investable recursion before ever knowing "who they are". Not based on pitch. Not based on résumé. Based how they behave when the formal system compresses against them. That’s where capital efficiency lives. AI isn’t used here to automate intelligence. It’s used to amplify internal recursion and detect the behavioral edge before traction arrives. The result is a portfolio not selected by pitch alone, but by structure. Not trained by advice, but by compression. &, in addition to thorough financial due diligence & market analysis, that’s how we maximize return: via identifying the system before it reveals itself & funding the recursion before the world catches up.


Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem shows that no formal system can verify its own truth from within. It can compress logic—but to recognize truth, it must step outside itself. This mirrors founder recursion: true behavioral clarity doesn’t emerge from performance heuristics or optimization hacks. It emerges from pressure that forces the system to self-update. Meaning is revealed not by following explicit systems—but by reorganizing under contradiction. That’s why the founder engine doesn’t just test information. It enables recursive transformative. ​​​​​​​

​

Our approach only promotes hills that we would die on ourselves, although that fact alone does not entirely support the thesis. Its value should be derived from the entirety of the track record of startups we have & will invest in.  

bottom of page